RTOS: 임베디드 시스템에서 시간 마스터하기

RTOS: Mastering Time in Embedded Systems

Navigating the World of Real-time Operating Systems

In a world increasingly driven by instantaneous feedback and automated intelligence, the concept of “real-time” extends far beyond mere speed. For developers building the invisible backbone of our modern world – embedded systems – real-time means precision and predictability. It signifies a guarantee that an operation will complete not just quickly, but within a strictly defined timeframe. This is the domain of Real-time Operating Systems (RTOS). These specialized kernels are the unsung heroes powering everything from medical devices and automotive control units to industrial robots and spacecraft. They ensure that critical tasks respond deterministically, reliably, and without fail, regardless of other system activity.

Photo by Amal S on Unsplash

Without an RTOS, managing complex, concurrent tasks in resource-constrained embedded environments can quickly devolve into an unmanageable spaghetti of interrupt handlers and ad-hoc scheduling logic. For developers, understanding and leveraging an RTOS isn’t just an advantage; it’s a fundamental requirement for creating robust, safe, and performant embedded applications that meet stringent deadlines. This article will cut through the theoretical and equip you with practical insights into building predictable, real-time embedded solutions.

First Steps into Real-time Embedded Programming

Embarking on your journey with Real-time Operating Systems might seem daunting, given their reputation for complexity. However, modern RTOS frameworks are designed with developer productivity in mind, offering structured approaches to concurrent programming that are far more manageable than a bare-metal, interrupt-driven design. Getting started involves understanding the core concepts and then diving into a popular, accessible RTOS.

Let’s begin with the fundamentals:

1. Tasks (or Threads):The basic unit of execution in an RTOS. Each task represents a piece of your application logic that runs semi-independently. Think of them as individual programs running concurrently on your microcontroller.
2. Scheduler: The heart of the RTOS. It’s responsible for deciding which task runs when. RTOS schedulers are typically preemptive, meaning they can interrupt a lower-priority task to allow a higher-priority task to run immediately.
3. Priorities:Each task is assigned a priority. The scheduler uses these priorities to determine execution order, ensuring critical tasks are always serviced first.
4. Inter-Task Communication (ITC) & Synchronization:Tasks often need to share data or coordinate their activities. RTOS provides mechanisms like queues, semaphores, mutexes, and event flags to facilitate this safely, preventing race conditions and deadlocks.

A Practical Starting Point: FreeRTOS

FreeRTOS is one of the most popular open-source RTOS, known for its small footprint, robust feature set, and extensive community support. It’s an excellent choice for beginners due to its clear documentation and many examples.

Step-by-Step Mini-Project: Blinking LEDs with FreeRTOS

Let’s imagine you have a common development board, like an STM32 Nucleo or an ESP32, capable of running FreeRTOS.

Prerequisites:

• A suitable microcontroller development board.
• An IDE like STM32CubeIDE (for STM32) or PlatformIO (for ESP32/various MCUs).
• Basic C programming knowledge.

Example Code Structure (Conceptual using FreeRTOS API):

#include "FreeRTOS.h"
#include "task.h"
#include "semphr.h" // For semaphores, if needed later
#include "queue.h" // For queues, if needed later // Define task prototypes
void vRedLEDTask(void pvParameters);
void vBlueLEDTask(void pvParameters); // --- Main Function ---
int main(void) { // Initialize hardware (clocks, GPIOs for LEDs) // ... (Your MCU-specific initialization code here) ... // Create tasks xTaskCreate(vRedLEDTask, // Task function "RedLED", // Task name (for debugging) configMINIMAL_STACK_SIZE, // Stack size in words NULL, // Parameters to pass to the task tskIDLE_PRIORITY + 1, // Priority (higher number = higher priority) NULL); // Handle to the created task (optional) xTaskCreate(vBlueLEDTask, // Task function "BlueLED", // Task name configMINIMAL_STACK_SIZE, NULL, tskIDLE_PRIORITY + 2, // Blue LED has slightly higher priority NULL); // Start the RTOS scheduler vTaskStartScheduler(); // The scheduler should never return. If it does, there's an error. for (;;) { / Error trap / }
} // --- Task Definitions --- void vRedLEDTask(void pvParameters) { TickType_t xLastWakeTime; const TickType_t xFrequency = pdMS_TO_TICKS(500); // 500ms delay // Initialize xLastWakeTime with the current time xLastWakeTime = xTaskGetTickCount(); for (;;) { // Toggle Red LED // ... (Your MCU-specific GPIO toggle code for Red LED) ... // Suspend this task for 500ms, ensuring predictable timing vTaskDelayUntil(&xLastWakeTime, xFrequency); }
} void vBlueLEDTask(void pvParameters) { TickType_t xLastWakeTime; const TickType_t xFrequency = pdMS_TO_TICKS(250); // 250ms delay xLastWakeTime = xTaskGetTickCount(); for (;;) { // Toggle Blue LED // ... (Your MCU-specific GPIO toggle code for Blue LED) ... // Suspend this task for 250ms vTaskDelayUntil(&xLastWakeTime, xFrequency); }
}

This simple example demonstrates how FreeRTOS allows you to define independent tasks, assign them priorities, and schedule them to run at specific intervals using vTaskDelayUntil. The scheduler ensures that the vBlueLEDTask (higher priority) will always get its turn before vRedLEDTask if they contend for CPU time, providing predictable timing. This structured approach is inherently more maintainable and scalable than managing multiple delays and flags within a single while(1) loop.

Your RTOS Toolkit: Essential Platforms and Debuggers

Developing with Real-time Operating Systems requires a robust set of tools that streamline the coding, compiling, flashing, and debugging processes. The right toolkit can significantly enhance developer productivity and ensure the precision and predictability vital for embedded systems.

Integrated Development Environments (IDEs)

Choosing the right IDE is foundational for RTOS development. These environments provide comprehensive suites for writing, building, and flashing your firmware.

1. STM32CubeIDE:If you’re working with STMicroelectronics’ vast portfolio of STM32 microcontrollers, STM32CubeIDE is indispensable. It integrates a graphical configurator (STM32CubeMX) for setting up peripherals and middleware (including FreeRTOS), a C/C++ development environment (based on Eclipse), and a debugger.

   • Installation:Download directly from the STMicroelectronics website. The installation guides are comprehensive.
   • Usage:Start a new project, select your MCU, and in the configurator, enable FreeRTOS under “Middleware.” It automatically generates the necessary RTOS files and configuration, allowing you to focus on application logic.

2. PlatformIO (with VS Code):For a more agnostic and flexible approach, PlatformIO is a powerful ecosystem built as a VS Code extension. It supports hundreds of development boards and frameworks, including various RTOS like FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Mbed OS.

   • Installation:Install VS Code, then search for and install the “PlatformIO IDE” extension from the VS Code Marketplace.
   • Usage:Create a new PlatformIO project, select your board, and specify the framework = freertos (or zephyr, etc.) in your platformio.ini file. PlatformIO handles toolchain setup, library management, and builds.

3. IAR Embedded Workbench / Keil MDK:These are commercial, highly optimized IDEs popular in professional embedded development, especially for safety-critical applications. They offer superior code optimization, advanced debugging features, and extensive microcontroller support.

   • Installation:Purchase licenses and download from IAR Systems or ARM Keil websites. They often provide evaluation versions.
   • Usage:Known for their robust project management and highly integrated debugging solutions, particularly with their own development kits.

Debugging and Tracing Tools

Debugging real-time systems is uniquely challenging due to concurrency and timing dependencies. Specialized tools are crucial.

1. Hardware Debuggers (J-Link, ST-Link):These devices provide the interface between your IDE and the microcontroller. They allow you to:

   • Set breakpoints in your C code.
   • Step through code line-by-line.
   • Inspect memory and register values.
   • View RTOS-specific information (e.g., task states, stack usage) through integration with IDEs.
   • Installation/Usage:Typically plug-and-play. Drivers are usually included with your IDE or board support package.

2. RTOS-Aware Debugging Plugins:Many IDEs and debuggers offer plugins or features specifically designed for RTOS.

   • FreeRTOS+Trace (Percepio Tracealyzer):An invaluable commercial tool for visualizing RTOS behavior. It records events like task switches, API calls, and resource usage, presenting them on a timeline. This helps identify performance bottlenecks, priority inversions, and other complex timing issues that are nearly impossible to catch with traditional breakpoints.
     • Integration:Requires instrumenting your FreeRTOS kernel (easy with provided macros) and then viewing the trace data in the Tracealyzer application.

3. Logic Analyzers/Oscilloscopes:For highly precise timing analysis at the hardware level, these tools are essential. They can visualize GPIO states, communication protocols (SPI, I2C), and interrupt timings, helping verify that your software’s real-time guarantees hold up against hardware events.

Version Control: Git and GitHub/GitLab

Version control is paramount, especially in team-based embedded projects where configurations and dependencies are critical.

• Git:Essential for tracking changes, collaborating, and managing different code versions. Learn basic commands (git clone, git add, git commit, git push, git pull, git branch, git merge).
• GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket:Cloud platforms for hosting Git repositories. They offer collaborative features like pull requests, issue tracking, and CI/CD pipelines, which are increasingly vital for automated testing and deployment of embedded firmware.

Mastering these tools enhances your ability to manage, debug, and optimize complex RTOS-based embedded projects, ultimately leading to more precise and predictable applications.

Crafting Predictable Code: RTOS in Action

The true power of an RTOS lies in its ability to manage complexity, enforce predictability, and abstract away much of the low-level scheduling logic from the application developer. Let’s delve into concrete examples and best practices that showcase RTOS in real-world scenarios.

Photo by Logan Voss on Unsplash

Code Examples: Inter-Task Communication (ITC) with Queues

A common pattern in RTOS applications is passing data between tasks. Queues are a highly effective and safe way to do this.

Scenario:A sensor reading task collects data, and a display task updates an LCD with that data.

#include "FreeRTOS.h"
#include "task.h"
#include "queue.h"
#include <stdio.h> // For simulated print // Define a structure for sensor data
typedef struct { int temperature; int humidity;
} SensorData_t; // Declare a global queue handle
QueueHandle_t xSensorDataQueue; // --- Sensor Reading Task ---
void vSensorReadingTask(void pvParameters) { TickType_t xLastWakeTime; const TickType_t xFrequency = pdMS_TO_TICKS(1000); // Read every 1 second SensorData_t xData; int counter = 0; xLastWakeTime = xTaskGetTickCount(); for (;;) { // Simulate sensor reading xData.temperature = 20 + (counter % 5); // Simulating change xData.humidity = 60 + (counter % 10); counter++; // Send data to the queue. Wait for up to 10 ticks if queue is full. if (xQueueSend(xSensorDataQueue, &xData, (TickType_t)10) != pdPASS) { printf("Sensor Task: Failed to send data to queue.\r\n"); } else { printf("Sensor Task: Sent Temp=%d, Humidity=%d\r\n", xData.temperature, xData.humidity); } vTaskDelayUntil(&xLastWakeTime, xFrequency); }
} // --- Display Update Task ---
void vDisplayUpdateTask(void pvParameters) { SensorData_t xReceivedData; for (;;) { // Wait indefinitely for data to arrive in the queue if (xQueueReceive(xSensorDataQueue, &xReceivedData, portMAX_DELAY) == pdPASS) { // Simulate updating an LCD printf("Display Task: Updating LCD with Temp=%d, Humidity=%d\r\n", xReceivedData.temperature, xReceivedData.humidity); // In a real system, this would involve LCD driver calls } else { printf("Display Task: Failed to receive data from queue.\r\n"); } }
} // --- Main Function (simplified) ---
void main_app(void) { // Renamed to avoid clash with main() if FreeRTOS port defines it // Create the queue before creating tasks that use it xSensorDataQueue = xQueueCreate(5, sizeof(SensorData_t)); // Queue can hold 5 SensorData_t items if (xSensorDataQueue != NULL) { xTaskCreate(vSensorReadingTask, "SensorRead", configMINIMAL_STACK_SIZE, NULL, tskIDLE_PRIORITY + 1, NULL); xTaskCreate(vDisplayUpdateTask, "DisplayUpdate", configMINIMAL_STACK_SIZE, NULL, tskIDLE_PRIORITY + 2, NULL); // Higher priority } // In a real application, vTaskStartScheduler() would be called here // For simulation, we'll just show the logic.
}

This example demonstrates:

• Task Isolation:vSensorReadingTask and vDisplayUpdateTask operate independently.
• Safe Data Exchange:The queue ensures that data is passed between tasks in a thread-safe manner, preventing corruption.
• Decoupling:The tasks don’t need to know the implementation details of each other, only the data format and the queue.
• Blocking Behavior:xQueueReceive(..., portMAX_DELAY) allows the display task to block indefinitely, consuming no CPU cycles until data is available, which is highly efficient.

Practical Use Cases: Where RTOS Shines

1. Automotive Systems (e.g., Engine Control Units - ECUs):

   • Challenge:Critical deadlines for fuel injection, ignition timing, and ABS. Failure to meet these could be catastrophic.
   • RTOS Solution:Hard real-time RTOS like QNX or AUTOSAR OS ensure deterministic execution of safety-critical tasks, prioritizing engine control over less critical functions like infotainment.
   • Pattern:Multiple tasks handling sensor inputs (RPM, throttle position), control algorithms (PID loops), and actuator outputs (injectors, spark plugs), all synchronized and prioritized.

2. Medical Devices (e.g., Pacemakers, Infusion Pumps):

   • Challenge:Life-sustaining operations require absolute reliability and precise timing.
   • RTOS Solution:Validated RTOS kernels (e.g., those certified to IEC 62304) provide the necessary guarantees for regulatory compliance and patient safety.
   • Pattern:Tasks for monitoring patient vitals, dosage calculations, alarm generation, and user interface updates, with stringent timing constraints enforced by the RTOS.

3. Industrial Automation (e.g., Robotics, PLC Systems):

   • Challenge:Precise control of motion, synchronized actions, and rapid response to emergency stops.
   • RTOS Solution:RTOS ensures robotic arms move exactly when commanded, and safety interlocks react within microseconds.
   • Pattern:Tasks for motor control (servo loops), sensor feedback (position, force), communication protocols (EtherCAT), and high-level sequence control, all orchestrated by the RTOS scheduler.

Best Practices for RTOS Development

• Prioritize Wisely:Assign priorities based on criticality and responsiveness requirements. Mis-prioritization can lead to missed deadlines or priority inversion.
• Minimize Critical Sections:Keep sections of code that disable interrupts or acquire mutexes as short as possible to avoid blocking higher-priority tasks.
• Avoid Busy-Waiting:Use RTOS-provided blocking mechanisms (e.g., vTaskDelay, xQueueReceive, xSemaphoreTake with timeouts or portMAX_DELAY) instead of while(condition) loops that waste CPU cycles.
• Guard Shared Resources:Always use mutexes or semaphores when multiple tasks access shared data structures or hardware peripherals to prevent race conditions.
• Define Stack Sizes Carefully:Tasks require their own stack. Too small, and you’ll get stack overflows; too large, and you waste precious RAM. Use RTOS-aware debugging to monitor stack usage.
• Handle Interrupts Efficiently:Keep Interrupt Service Routines (ISRs) short and fast. Defer complex processing to a dedicated RTOS task using mechanisms like queues or direct-to-task notifications.
• Error Handling:Implement robust error checking for RTOS API calls. Check return values (e.g., pdPASS, errQUEUE_FULL).

By adhering to these principles and leveraging the robust features of an RTOS, developers can construct embedded applications that are not only functional but also reliably precise and predictably performant.

RTOS vs. Bare-Metal: Choosing Your Embedded Path

When developing for microcontrollers, a fundamental decision involves whether to use a Real-time Operating System (RTOS) or to manage everything directly on a “bare-metal” setup. Both approaches have their merits, and the optimal choice often hinges on the project’s complexity, real-time requirements, and resource constraints. Understanding the trade-offs is crucial for making an informed decision.

Bare-Metal Development: The Raw Power Approach

Bare-metal development means programming directly on the microcontroller hardware without any underlying operating system abstraction. Your application code is the sole software running.

Pros of Bare-Metal:

• Minimal Overhead:No kernel, no scheduler, no task switching means zero RTOS memory footprint or CPU cycle consumption for the OS itself. This is ideal for extremely resource-constrained devices (e.g., 8-bit microcontrollers with very limited RAM).
• Full Control:You have direct access and complete control over all hardware registers, interrupts, and timings. This can be beneficial for highly optimized, low-latency routines.
• Simplicity for Trivial Tasks:For single-purpose, sequential applications (e.g., a simple blinking LED, reading a single sensor), bare-metal can be simpler to get off the ground without the added complexity of an RTOS.
• Predictable for Simple Systems:If carefully structured, a bare-metal loop can be deterministic, especially with well-managed interrupts.

Cons of Bare-Metal:

• Complexity for Concurrency:Managing multiple concurrent tasks (e.g., reading multiple sensors, communicating over different protocols, updating a display) becomes extremely complex. You often end up writing your own rudimentary scheduler using flags, state machines, and timers, which is error-prone and hard to debug.
• Poor Maintainability & Scalability:As project scope grows, adding new features or modifying existing ones in a bare-metal concurrent system can be a nightmare. Code often becomes tightly coupled, and changes in one area can unexpectedly impact others.
• Resource Management Issues:Shared resources (like peripherals or global variables) are difficult to protect from race conditions without explicit, custom synchronization mechanisms.
• Debugging Challenges:Debugging timing issues, deadlocks, or priority conflicts in a bare-metal system is significantly harder without RTOS-aware tools.

RTOS Development: The Orchestrated Approach

An RTOS provides a layer of abstraction between your application code and the hardware, offering services for task management, inter-task communication, and resource synchronization.

Pros of RTOS:

• Structured Concurrency:Simplifies the design of complex applications by allowing you to break down functionality into independent, manageable tasks.
• Predictability & Determinism:The scheduler ensures that tasks meet their deadlines, providing guaranteed response times crucial for real-time systems. Critical tasks are serviced predictably.
• Improved Maintainability & Scalability:Modular task design makes code easier to understand, maintain, and extend. New features can often be added as new tasks with minimal impact on existing ones.
• Robust Inter-Task Communication (ITC):Built-in mechanisms (queues, semaphores, mutexes) provide safe and efficient ways for tasks to communicate and synchronize, eliminating common concurrency bugs.
• Resource Management:RTOS offers robust solutions for protecting shared resources, preventing race conditions and deadlocks.
• Enhanced Debugging:Many RTOS come with powerful debugging tools and integrations that provide visibility into task states, stack usage, and scheduling events, making it easier to diagnose complex timing issues.
• Commercial Support & Ecosystem:Established RTOS often have strong communities, extensive documentation, and commercial support options.

Cons of RTOS:

• Overhead:An RTOS kernel consumes some memory (RAM for code and task stacks) and CPU cycles (for task switching and API calls). For very small microcontrollers, this overhead might be prohibitive.
• Learning Curve:There’s an initial learning curve to understand RTOS concepts (tasks, priorities, IPC, scheduling) and API usage.
• Configuration Complexity:Configuring an RTOS correctly (e.g., setting tick rates, stack sizes, heap sizes) can require careful attention.
• Potential for Non-Determinism (if misused):While RTOS promotes predictability, incorrect usage (e.g., poorly chosen priorities, long critical sections, inefficient blocking) can still introduce non-deterministic behavior.

When to Choose Which

• Choose Bare-Metal when:

  • Your application is very simple, performs one or two sequential actions, and doesn’t require complex concurrency.
  • You are working with extremely limited hardware resources (e.g., less than 8KB Flash, 2KB RAM) where every byte and cycle counts.
  • The absolute lowest latency for a single, critical operation is paramount, and you’re confident in managing interrupt priorities manually.
  • You are a highly experienced embedded developer with a deep understanding of the specific microcontroller and its registers, and you prefer direct hardware control.

• Choose RTOS when:

  • Your application involves multiple independent functions that need to run concurrently (e.g., sensor data acquisition, display updates, network communication, user input processing).
  • You have strict timing requirements and deadlines for different tasks (e.g., hard real-time guarantees).
  • You anticipate future expansion or feature additions, where modularity is key.
  • You need robust, safe inter-task communication and resource protection.
  • Your team needs a standardized framework for developing complex embedded software.
  • The microcontroller has sufficient resources (typically 32-bit MCUs with tens of KBs of Flash and RAM are suitable).
  • You value maintainability, scalability, and ease of debugging for complex systems.

In essence, an RTOS provides a powerful framework for managing complexity and ensuring predictable behavior in sophisticated embedded applications. While bare-metal offers ultimate control and minimal overhead for simple systems, the benefits of an RTOS in terms of structure, safety, and productivity far outweigh its overhead for most modern embedded projects.

Embracing Predictability: The Future of Embedded

Real-time Operating Systems are not merely a technical choice; they represent a fundamental paradigm shift in how developers approach embedded software design, particularly when precision and predictability are non-negotiable. From the life-saving capabilities of medical devices to the intricate coordination of industrial robots and the responsive control in autonomous vehicles, RTOS acts as the silent conductor, ensuring every operation plays its part on cue.

For developers, embracing RTOS translates directly into building more reliable, maintainable, and scalable embedded applications. It transforms the chaotic realm of concurrent tasks and tight timing into an organized, deterministic orchestration. By providing proven mechanisms for task scheduling, inter-task communication, and resource management, RTOS frees developers from reinventing the wheel, allowing them to focus on the core application logic and innovate within a robust, predictable framework. As embedded systems become even more interconnected and intelligent, demanding higher levels of safety and responsiveness, the role of RTOS will only continue to grow, solidifying its position as an indispensable tool in the modern embedded developer’s arsenal. Mastering these systems is not just about writing code; it’s about crafting the future of dependable computing.

Your RTOS Queries Answered & Key Terms Defined

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What’s the main difference between an RTOS and a general-purpose OS like Linux? The primary difference lies in their scheduling guarantees. A general-purpose OS (GPOS) like Linux prioritizes throughput and fairness among tasks, aiming for good average response times, but offers no strict guarantees on when a task will run or complete. An RTOS, conversely, prioritizes determinism and predictability, guaranteeing that critical tasks will execute and complete within a specified, hard deadline. This makes an RTOS suitable for time-critical applications where missed deadlines can lead to system failure or danger.

2. Is an RTOS always necessary for embedded systems? No, not always. For very simple embedded applications with minimal concurrency, no strict timing requirements, or extremely limited hardware resources, a bare-metal approach (without an RTOS) can be sufficient and even preferable due to its minimal overhead. However, as system complexity increases, requiring multiple concurrent tasks, inter-task communication, and predictable timing, an RTOS quickly becomes indispensable for managing complexity, ensuring reliability, and boosting developer productivity.

3. What is “priority inversion” and how does an RTOS help prevent it? Priority inversion occurs when a higher-priority task is blocked by a lower-priority task because the lower-priority task holds a shared resource (like a mutex) that the higher-priority task needs. This effectively inverts their priorities. An RTOS helps prevent this through mechanisms like priority inheritance (temporarily boosting the priority of the lower-priority task holding the resource to that of the blocking high-priority task) or priority ceilings(assigning a mutex a priority ceiling equal to the highest priority of any task that might acquire it).

4. How do I choose the right RTOS for my project? Selecting an RTOS depends on several factors:

• Hardware Compatibility:Does it support your specific microcontroller?
• Resource Footprint:How much Flash/RAM does it consume? Does your MCU have enough?
• Licensing:Is it open-source (e.g., FreeRTOS, Zephyr) or commercial (e.g., µC/OS, QNX)?
• Features:Does it offer the necessary inter-task communication, memory management, and networking features?
• Community & Support:How active is the community? Are commercial support options available?
• Safety/Security Certifications:Is certification required for your application (e.g., medical, automotive)?

5. Can an RTOS run on any microcontroller? While many modern 32-bit microcontrollers (like ARM Cortex-M series) are well-suited for RTOS, the feasibility depends on the microcontroller’s resources (CPU speed, Flash memory, RAM) and the specific RTOS’s minimum requirements. Extremely small 8-bit or 16-bit microcontrollers with very limited memory might struggle with the overhead of an RTOS, making a bare-metal approach more practical in such niche cases.

Essential Technical Terms

1. Determinism:The property of a system where the output, given the same initial state and input, will always be the same, and crucially, the timing of that output will also be the same. In RTOS, it refers to the guarantee of task completion within a predictable timeframe.
2. Latency:The delay between a cause and effect, or specifically in RTOS, the time taken from an event (e.g., an interrupt) occurring to the corresponding task beginning its execution.
3. Jitter:The deviation from the true periodicity of a signal or task execution. In RTOS, it refers to the variability in task response times or periodic execution, which ideally should be minimized for hard real-time systems.
4. Priority Inversion:A scheduling anomaly where a high-priority task is forced to wait for a lower-priority task to release a shared resource, effectively inverting their intended priorities. RTOS mechanisms like priority inheritance aim to prevent this.
5. Preemption:The act of interrupting a currently executing task and switching the CPU to a higher-priority task that has become ready to run. Most RTOS schedulers are preemptive, ensuring critical tasks respond quickly.

---

Published on November 20, 2025